Legal Opinion
Bahlman v. Hudson Motor Car Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided November 9, 1939No. Docket No. 9, Calendar No. 40,473PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] I am not in accord with the foregoing opinion. Plaintiff, as a traveling shoe salesman, was in the habit of driving his car 30,000 or more miles during a single year. Previous to the accident which gives rise to this litigation, he had an automobile accident in 1935 and two more accidents in 1936. Plaintiff testified that through newspaper advertising he became particularly aware of new safety features which had been developed in the automotive industry, and was…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Mazetti v. Armour & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
- Baxter v. Ford Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1932
- Greco v. S. S. Kresge Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Davis v. Van Camp Packing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1920
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Burr v. Sherwin Williams Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
- Barbara F. Evans, Personal Representative of the Estate of Roy Evans, Deceased v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966
- Cartel Capital Corp. v. Fireco of New JerseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Bexiga v. Havir Manufacturing Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.