Murphy v. McGraw
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Bay. (Cobb, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
This action is brought to recover money paid by plaintiff to defendant for a horse, and money expended by plaintiff in attempting to cure the horse of disease. Plaintiff had a verdict and judgment in the court below for $601.50. Defendant brings error.
The declaration is upon the common counts in assumpsit, to which are added two special counts, setting out the purchase and sale of the horse under a warranty that he was sound, straight, and all right, and just such a horse as plaintiff wanted, and met all the requirements stated by plaintiff to defendant prior to the purchase, *320alleging a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hubbardston Lumber Co. v. BatesMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Grannis v. HookerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
- Beardslee v. HortonMichigan Supreme Court · 1855
- Nugent v. TeachoutMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Phippen v. MorehouseMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Coyle and Smith v. BaumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
- Needham v. HalversonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
- Ellis v. HiltonMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Stowe v. MatherMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
- Curby v. MastenbrookMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.