Legal Opinion

Boos v. Claude

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1943No. File No. 8518PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRudolph, J.

This is an action for personal injuries claimed to have been sustained as the result of an alleged defect in a used automobile sold to the plaintiff by the defendants. The pleadings admit that the defendants, under the name of Murphy Finance Company, are engaged “in the business of financing the purchase and sale of motor vehicles, in repossessing those not paid for and in selling them to the public for the use upon the public highways.” The facts disclose that in August, 1939, plaintiff’s brother contacted one J. W. McNabb, the assistant manager of the Murphy Finance Company. Plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. International Products Co. v. Erie R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
  2. Rittenhouse, Winterson Auto. Co. v. KissnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1916
  3. Curby v. MastenbrookMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Donaldson v. CarstensenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  5. Kuester v. Paige Sales Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. Wildcat Cave, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Moore v. Kluthe & Lane Ins. Agency, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Sodak Distributing Company v. WayneSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Farmers Ins. Exchange v. ArltNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
  5. French v. Dell Rapids Community Hospital, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1988

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API