Legal Opinion

Groening v. Opsata

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1948No. Docket No. 73, Calendar No. 44,180PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarr, J.

In March, 1945, the defendants Theodore Opsata and Jennie M. Opsata, husband and wife, conveyed to plaintiffs a parcel of land in Berrien county on the shore of Lake Michigan. Located on the property was a residence which defendants had built on a bluff overlooking the lake. The total consideration paid by plaintiffs was the sum of $11,000. Following the transaction the bluff, as a result of the action of the elements and of the waves from the lake, was completely eroded — finally disappearing entirely during the year 1946. Plaintiffs sued for damages, claiming that they had purchased the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Smith v. WerkheiserMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Busch v. WilcoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Grigg v. HannaMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. AsheMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Plate v. Detroit Fidelity & Surety Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1924

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. M&D, INC v. McCONKEYMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Hord v. Environmental Research InstituteMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  3. John MacDonald, Jr. v. Thomas M. Cooley Law SchoolCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  4. Sullivan v. UlrichMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Lumber Village, Inc v. SieglerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API