Legal Opinion

Sylvester Hansen v. Firestone Tire and Rubber Company

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 2, 1960No. 13816_1PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Circuit Judge.

In this action for damages involving personal injuries and property damage, the jury returned a verdict for plaintiff in the amount of $8,000. Some six months later, the United States District Court entered judgment for the defendant, non obstante veredicto. On this appeal, the plaintiff urges that the judgment of the trial court be set aside and that a judgment in his favor be entered on the verdict of the jury.

The action of the plaintiff was based upon the alleged negligence of employees of the defendant company in mounting tires on his automobile and, further, upon…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hertzler v. ManshumMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Bahlman v. Hudson Motor Car Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Senter v. BF Goodrich CompanyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1954
  4. Curby v. MastenbrookMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Ein v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Doris R. Edwards, Etc., Cross-Appellant v. Sears, Roebuck and Company, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  2. Hauter v. ZogartsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Holmes v. WilsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Shamrock Fuel & Oil Sales Co. v. TunksTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Anita Pritchard, Administratrix of the Estate of Otto E. Pritchard, Deceased v. Liggett & Myers Tobacco Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API