Legal Opinion
Horwath v. City of East Palo Alto
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 28, 1989No. A040661PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ANDERSON, P. J.
We decide in this opinion that the City of East Palo Alto’s (City) failure to comply fully with statutory requirements governing preparation of an impartial analysis of a proposed ballot measure does not invalidate the subsequently enacted rent control ordinance or its rent rollback provision. Accordingly, the appellants,1 certain owners of rental property in East Palo Alto, are not entitled to a writ of mandate commanding respondents City and its Rent Stabilization Board (Board) to refrain from enforcing the ordinance and the rollback.
I. Factual Background
A. Rent…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Canales v. City of AlvisoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Rideout v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Hardie v. EuCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Planned Parenthood Affiliates v. Van De KampCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Davis v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Friends of Sierra Madre v. City of Sierra MadreCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Owens v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- California Gillnetters Ass'n v. Department of Fish & GameCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Cummings v. StanleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- PEOPLE EX REL. KERR v. County of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.