Legal Opinion

Friends of Sierra Madre v. City of Sierra Madre

California Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 2001No. S085088PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BAXTER, J.

This case presents an issue important to local governments and those interested in historic preservation: whether an initiative ballot measure, generated by a city council rather than by voter petition, submitting to the voters an ordinance that removes a structure or structures from historic preservation status, is a project subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA; Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.). 1 We conclude that CEQA compliance is required when a project is proposed and placed on the ballot by a public agency. In so doing we reject defendants’…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Western States Petroleum Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Bozung v. Local Agency Formation CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. DeVita v. County of NapaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Tuolumne Jobs & Small Business Alliance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Poet v. State Air Resources BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. Quantification Settlement Agreement CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. County Sanitation District No. 2 v. County of KernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  5. Citizens for a Sustainable Treasure Island v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API