Legal Opinion

Hardie v. Eu

California Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1976No. S.F. 23450PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RICHARDSON, J.

In this original mandamus proceeding, we consider the constitutionality of sections 85200-85202 of the Government Code, which impose limitations on the amount that can be expended in furtherance of the circulation of petitions by which initiative measures may qualify for the statewide ballot. We conclude that these sections infringe impermissibly upon rights of speech and association guaranteed by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. Accordingly, we will issue our peremptory writ of mandate commanding respondent state officials to refrain from enforcing…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Shelton v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Calfarm Insurance v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Fair Political Practices Commission v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Taxpayers to Limit Campaign Spending v. Fair Political Practices CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Governor Gray Davis Committee v. American Taxpayers AllianceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. San Jose Mercury-News v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API