Legal Opinion

Owens v. County of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 2, 2013No. B242291, B242393PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KITCHING, J.

INTRODUCTION

In this opinion we adjudicate two appeals challenging a utility user tax (UUT) enacted pursuant to a measure approved by the voters. Appellants contend the UUT is unlawful because it violated the voters’ due process and free speech rights and because the tax was imposed in violation of Proposition 218 and the Elections Code. We publish this case to address these important substantive legal issues and to provide an example of when the doctrine of judicial estoppel should apply.

The present appeals arise from two separate superior court class actions against…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Calfarm Insurance v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Saint Agnes Medical Center v. PacifiCare of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Stanson v. MottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Blanton v. Womancare, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Green Valley Landowners Ass'n v. City of VallejoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. Johnson v. Cnty. of Mendocino, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  3. Kerley v. Weber, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  4. Alameda County Taxpayers' Assn. v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
  5. Amundson v. CatelloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API