Chapman v. Zoberlein
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The action is to quiet title and the appeal is by the plaintiff from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
The defendant’s title depends on the validity of a tax sale to the state of California, a deed to the state in pursuance thereof, and a subsequent conveyance for the state by the tax-collector to the defendant.
The case comes precisely within the rule of the cases of Miller v. Williams, 135 Cal. 183, [67 Pac. 788]; Labs v. Cooper, 107 Cal. 656, [40 Pac. 1042]; San Diego Realty Co. v. Cornell, 150 Cal. 637, [89 Pac. 603], and Fox v. Townsend, ante, p. 51, [91…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Baird v. MonroeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Bank of Lemoore v. FulghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Best v. WohlfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Miller v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Fox v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Malott v. Board of County CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 1930
- River Farms Co. v. California GibsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Sherwood v. WallinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Hall v. BartlettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Stough v. ReevesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.