Legal Opinion

Miller v. Williams

California Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1901No. S.F. No. 2531PublishedCited by 34 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.

Action to quiet title to land in the city of Santa Cruz.

It was stipulated, for the purposes of the trial, that plaintiff is entitled to judgment, unless defendants have acquired the title of the testatrix, Cathalina E. Brewster, by the tax deed made by the city tax collector, dated August 17, 1895, or by the tax deed made by the county tax collector, October 9, 1895.

It was further stipulated that all the proceedings upon which the deeds were founded were regular and in compliance with law, except in the particulars which might be specified as defendants put in their evidence. Defendants then…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Harper v. RoweCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Bucknall v. StoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Simmons v. McCarthyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Cadwalader v. NashCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Labs v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Baird v. MonroeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Best v. WohlfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Hall v. ChamberlainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Davis v. Fresno Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. Burton v. HooverUtah Supreme Court · 1937

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API