Fox v. Wright
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
This is an action to quiet title, wherein plaintiff relied upon a tax-deed to himself from the state of California. It is in all vital respects like the case of Fox v. Townsend, ante, p. 51, [91 Pac. 1004], this day decided.
In the published delinquent list numerals were employed to represent dollars and cents, without having prefixed thereto the dollar-mark. But the meaning and use of these numerals were fully explained in the publication itself. The case is therefore not at all the one where nothing appears to explain the intended meaning of the figures, (People v. Hastings, 34 Cal. 571),…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Baird v. MonroeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Bank of Lemoore v. FulghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Ellis v. WitmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- People v. HastingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- People v. Reclamation District No. 136California Supreme Court · 1898
3Cited by26 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Malott v. Board of County CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 1930
- Mercury Herald Co. v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Inhabitants of the Town of Warren v. NorwoodSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1941
- In Re Sutter-Butte By-Pass Assessment No. 6California Supreme Court · 1923
- Smith v. FurlongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.