Legal Opinion
River Farms Co. v. California Gibson
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 25, 1935No. Civ. 5194PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
No effort is made in this opinion to analyze all, or quote from the almost unlimited number of cases cited in the briefs, but only such general principies will be set forth and authorities cited as we deem necessary to a solution of the questions involved.
This cause is before us upon the application of the above-named petitioner for a writ of mandate directing the respondent, California Gibson, as Treasurer of the County of Colusa, and as Trustee of Reclamation District No. 108, to execute a deed of conveyance transferring and conveying to the petitioner a certain tract of land designated as…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Von Hoffman v. City of QuincySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- W. B. Worthen Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Jones v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1931
- Louisiana v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Morris v. Reclamation District No. 108California Supreme Court · 1941
- Islais Co., Ltd. v. MathesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Franklin v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Sutter Basin Corp. v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- People v. AlbinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.