Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Malott v. Board of County Commissioners

Montana Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1930No. 6,700PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HONORABLE FRANK P. LEIPER, District Judge, sitting in place of MR. JUSTICE ANGSTMAN, disqualified,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an original proceeding, wherein the relators seek a writ of mandate against the board of county commissioners of Cascade County. An alternative writ issued. The respondents appeared by motion to quash and by answer.

The facts out of which this controversy grows may be briefly summarized: The Chestnut Valley irrigation district was organized under the provisions of Chapter 146 of the Session Laws of 1909, and Acts amendatory thereof. The lands included…

2Cases cited77 opinions

  1. Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
  2. Panama Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Norwood v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. Von Hoffman v. City of QuincySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  5. Bramwell v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Diederichs v. State Highway CommissionMontana Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Lowery v. Garfield CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1949
  3. La Mesa Lemon Grove & Spring Valley Irrigation District v. HornbeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Hanson v. BurrisUtah Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Jensen Livestock Co. v. Custer CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1942

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API