Legal Opinion
Hausner v. Hopewell Products, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 18, 1960PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, Hopewell Products, Inc., 'Charles Vergoña and Paul Puff appeal from an order granting petitioner’s application to direct appellants to permit him to inspect and copy the books, papers and records of the corporate appellant. Order affirmed, with costs. The dispute as to petitioner’s claim of right to inspection is not arbitrable under the provisions of the agreement between the individual parties. Even if it were, it clearly appears that no bona fide dispute exists and that there is no real 'basis for appellants’ claim that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re the Arbitration Between International Association of MacHinists, District No. 15, Local No. 402, & Cutler-Hammer, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1947
- MATTER OF COHEN v. Cocoline Prods.New York Court of Appeals · 1955
- S. A. Wenger & Co. v. Propper Silk Hosiery Mills, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1924
- In re the Arbitration between General Electric Co. & United Electrical Radio & Machine Workers of America, C.I.O.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
- In re Arbitration between Essenson & Upper Queens Medical GroupNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State Division of Human Rights v. New York State Department of Correctional ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Cooke v. OutlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- In re HammermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- In re MarcatoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984