Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re Hammerman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 1, 1979Published

1Dissent

Fein, J. P., and Sullivan, J., dissent in part in a memorandum by Sullivan, J., as follows:

While we agree with our colleagues that the matter should be remanded for a hearing to determine the books, records and documentary data to which the stockholder is entitled, we would not, as they would, remand for a hearing on the issue of good faith. It has been repeatedly held that a stockholder cannot be deprived of the right to inspect and examine corporate books and records for a proper purpose unless the corporation can prove the stockholder’s bad faith. (Matter of S & S Realty Corp. v Kleer-Vu…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Ludwig v. Ludwig & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  2. S. & S. Realty Corp. v. Kleer-Vu Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  3. Hausner v. Hopewell Products, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
  4. Hansen v. Marblette Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API