Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re Marcato

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 4, 1984Published

1Dissent

Titone, J. P., dissents and votes to affirm the judgment appealed from, with the following memorandum:

As the majority notes, apart from statutory rights embodied in the Business Corporation Law, shareholders have a somewhat broader common-law right to inspect corporate books and records for a “proper purpose”. While the majority concedes that when the statutory right is invoked, the burden of disproving a proper purpose is on the corporation, it urges that the rule is the converse when the common-law right is involved. Because I cannot accept that dichotomy, I dissent. 11 In Matter of Hausner…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Danann Realty Corp. v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
  2. People v. OlahNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  3. Dougherty v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  4. Matter of Durr v. Paragon Trading Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
  5. Monroe v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API