Legal Opinion
S. A. Wenger & Co. v. Propper Silk Hosiery Mills, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 16, 1924PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPound, J.
The petitioner herein sets forth a written contract for the purchase and sale of silk entered into by it with the Propper Silk Hosiery Mills, Inc., which contains the following arbitration clause:
“ Arbitration. In the event of any dispute arising relative to the fulfillment of any of the above terms, and failing an amicable adjustment, it shall be settled by arbitration, under the rules of the Silk Association of America, the decision of the Arbitrators to be final and binding on both parties.”
It further alleges that a dispute has arisen between the parties under the contract with respect to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Matter of Berkovitz v. . Arbib HoulbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Standard Casing Co. v. . California Casing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Wood v. . TunnicliffNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
3Cited by46 opinions
- Matter of Lipman (Haeuser Shellac Co.)New York Court of Appeals · 1942
- In Re the Arbitration Between International Association of MacHinists, District No. 15, Local No. 402, & Cutler-Hammer, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1947
- Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Harrisons & Crosfield, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- In re Arbitration between Exercycle Corp. & MarattaNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
- Shanferoke Coal & Supply Corp. of Delaware v. Westchester Service Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.