Legal Opinion

In re Arbitration between Essenson & Upper Queens Medical Group

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 20, 1954PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Voorhis, J.

The order appealed from affirms an order directing the parties to proceed to arbitration. Appellant contends that there is no arbitrable dispute, and that for this reason the application for arbitration should have been denied. The issue arises over the expulsion of respondent, a physician, from a partnership known as Upper Queens Medical Group, the appellant. Appellant is affiliated with Health Insurance Plan of Greater New York, commonly known as H. I. P. The latter organization was established under legislative act to provide medical services to its subscribers on a prepaid premium basis.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re the Arbitration Between International Association of MacHinists, District No. 15, Local No. 402, & Cutler-Hammer, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1947
  2. In re the Arbitration between General Electric Co. & United Electrical Radio & Machine Workers of America, C.I.O.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
  3. Alpert v. Admiration Knitwear Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1952

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. In re the Arbitration between General Warehousemen's Union & Glidden Co.New York Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Hausner v. Hopewell Products, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
  3. In re the Arbitration between District 2, Marine Engineers Beneficial Ass'n & Isbrandtsen Co.New York Supreme Court · 1962
  4. In re the Arbitration between Lloyd & A. Hollander & Son, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1959
  5. In re the Arbitration between Katz & BurkinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API