In Re the Arbitration Between International Association of MacHinists, District No. 15, Local No. 402, & Cutler-Hammer, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Thacher, and Dye, JJ.; Ftjld, J., dissents in following memorandum in which Desmond, J., concurs.
A claim may be“ so unconscionable or a defense so frivolous ’ ’ as to justify the court in refusing to order the parties to proceed to arbitration (Matter of Wenger & Co. v. Propper Silk Hosiery Mills, 239 N. Y. 199, 202), but I do not so regard the claim here asserted. I have difficulty in concluding, as respondent urges, that reasonable men cannot differ as to the meaning of the provision in question. While I see…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- S. A. Wenger & Co. v. Propper Silk Hosiery Mills, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1924
3Cited by119 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- In Re the Arbitration Between Board of Education of Watertown City School District & Watertown Education Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Posner v. Grunwald-Marx, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1961
- In re Arbitration between Exercycle Corp. & MarattaNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
- International Union of Electrical, Radio and MacHine Workers, Afl-Cio v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.