Shahabian v. Najarian
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
MUNDO, J., pro tem.
Plaintiffs’ second amended complaint alleges that the plaintiff wife is, and at all times mentioned in the complaint was, an incompetent person; that on or about March 27, 1920, she entered into a partnership with George Carpenter for the purpose of operating a retail drug business; that she contributed as her share of the capital the sum of $1400 cash and her interest in a business formerly conducted by her then lately deceased husband and the said Carpenter; that in 1924 the business was sold and with the proceeds thereof they purchased certain real property upon which…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cooley v. Miller & LuxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Carlson v. LantzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Metropolis Tr. & Sav. Bank v. MonnierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Reynolds v. Sorosis Fruit CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Magee v. BrennemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Huebotter v. FollettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Bradner. v. VasquezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Lady v. WorthinghamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Bisno v. HerzbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Fried v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.