Legal Opinion

Magee v. Brenneman

California Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1922No. L. A. No. 6519PublishedCited by 16 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLawlor, J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff, Henry C. Magee, from a judgment in favor of the defendants Clayton B. Brenneman and Frilletta Gr. Brenneman, his wife, in an action tried by the court, sitting without a jury, to foreclose a mortgage given by the said two defendants to secure a promissory note for $10,000 executed by the said parties in favor of appellant’s assignor, one Miguel Estadillo. It was found that certain fictitious persons, joiped as defendants, were not served with complaint or summons, and were found to have no interest in the property.

It appears that on July 18, 1911, the said…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of CoverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Shirk v. NeibleIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  3. In Re Estate of HiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Kisling v. ShawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Dimond v. SandersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Trafton v. YoungbloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Huskinson & Brown, Limited Liability Partnership v. WolfCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Johnson v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Jeffry v. PoundsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. Bradner. v. VasquezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API