Bradner. v. Vasquez
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.
B. J. Bradner, an attorney at law, commenced this action against defendants for money alleged to be due on a contract of employment entered into during the existence of the attorney-client relationship. On a prior appeal, it was held that the second amended complaint stated facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. (Bradner v. Vasquez, 102 Cal.App.2d 338 [227 P.2d 559].) Bradner *149died prior to trial and his wife, as executrix, was substituted as plaintiff. Judgment was entered for defendants, from which plaintiff appeals. The trial court found, among other things, that the contract was…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Smellie v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
- In Re Estate of CoverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Westberg v. WilldeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Morgan Clark v. MillsapCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Cooley v. Miller & LuxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Trafton v. YoungbloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Main v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- Rader v. ThrasherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Boyd v. BevilacquaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Eisenbaum v. Western Energy Resources, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.