Legal Opinion

Fried v. Municipal Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 2, 1949No. Civ. 17233PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, J.

Appeal from judgment dismissing a petition for writ of mandate.

Petitioner brought an action in the municipal court of Los Angeles on a written contract signed by Mae Christian for the purchase of household furniture. Two persons were named as defendants under fictitious names. Defendant Christian failed to answer, whereupon a judgment by default was entered against her for the balance due on the contract, together with attorney’s fees.

Thereafter petitioner, plaintiff in the municipal court action, filed an affidavit with the clerk pursuant to section 989 * of the Code of Civil Procedure…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bell v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Roseborough v. CampbellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. Cooper v. BurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Flores v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. Shahabian v. NajarianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Vincent v. GraysonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  2. Jonson v. WeinsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Nissan v. BartonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Meller & Snyder v. R & T PROPERTIES, INC.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. McRae v. BatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API