Van Slyke v. Arrowhead Reservoir & Power Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This is an action to quiet title to a tract of land. Judgment was given in the court below in favor of the defendant, declaring it to be the owner of the land. The plaintiff appeals from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
The decision in the case depends on the meaning and effect of a certain deed executed on June 2, 1891, by the plaintiff to the Arrowhead Reservoir Company. The defendant company is the successor in interest of the last-named company. In order to a proper understanding of the deed it will be necessary to give a statement of some previous…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Nye v. MoodyTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- Sears v. AckermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Dohoney v. WomackCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1892
- Smith v. FurbishSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1894
- Butler v. GoslingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Industrial Indemnity Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Victory Oil Co. v. Hancock Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
- Raab v. CasperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Kraemer v. KraemerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Henningsen v. StrombergMontana Supreme Court · 1950
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.