Legal Opinion
Henningsen v. Stromberg
Montana Supreme Court
Decided July 17, 1950No. 8892PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MR. JUSTICE BOTTOMLY:
Action by the plaintiff, Phyllis M. Henningsen, to quiet title to three mining claims, namely, the Frenchman No. 2, Missouri Girl and Rear Stake, located in Silver Bow county, Montana. There are numerous defendants named in the complaint. The action is brought under the authority of Chapter 198, Laws of 1937, and the provisions ■ of Chapter 63 of the Code of Civil Procedure of 1935.
The answering defendants were: Katherine Avare, Elinor G. McCarthy, Anaconda Copper Mining Company, a corporation, Eugene Albert Doráis, Mrs. Eugene Albert Doráis, Charles Edouard Doráis, Mrs.…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Van Renesselaer v. KearneySupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- New York Indians v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- In Re Clark's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1937
- Lindsay v. FreemanTexas Supreme Court · 1892
- Estate of McCarthyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Larry C. Iverson, Inc. v. BoumaMontana Supreme Court · 1981
- Sharpe v. SmithNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
- Wicklund v. SundheimMontana Supreme Court · 2016
- Wood v. ASHBYUtah Supreme Court · 1952
- First National Bank in Billings v. First Bank Stock Corp.District Court, D. Montana · 1961
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.