Industrial Indemnity Co. v. City & County of San Francisco
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CHANNELL, J.
In this case of first impression, we hold that a true sale and leaseback of real property—one that is not a financing transaction— constitutes a change in ownership within the meaning of Proposition 13, triggering reassessment of the property. (See Cal. Const., art. XIII A, § 2, subd. (a).)
I. Facts
In 1984, appellant Industrial Indemnity Company owned real property and improvements at 255 California Street in San Francisco. For the 1984-1985 tax year, respondent City and County of San Francisco had assessed property taxes against this property based on a full-value…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Cal. Drive-In Restaurant Assn. v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- People Ex Rel. Younger v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. County of RiversideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Board of Supervisors v. LonerganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Alan v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007
- Pacific Southwest Realty Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Azusa Land Reclamation Co. v. Main San Gabriel Basin WatermasterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Farm Sanctuary Inc. v. Dept. of Food and AgricultureCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- MHC Financing Limited Partnership Two v. City of SanteeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.