Legal Opinion

Dohoney v. Womack

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 22, 1892No. 10PublishedCited by 25 opinions

This appeal was first decided by the Commission of Appeals, and their report adopted by the Supreme Court on the 24th day of May, 1892. Afterward a motion for rehearing was granted and the case transferred to the Court of Civil Appeals, Second District, where the opinion on rehearing was rendered.

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiffs brought this suit as the heirs of John D. Womack, Jr., and Archie Womack, to recover of the defendant, E. L. Dohoney, a two-thirds interest in a tract of 825 1/2 acres of land of the S. M. Fulton survey, in Lamar County. They pleaded their title, deriving it from one W. W. Stell; recognized an interest of one-third of the land in the defendant as the grantee of Mrs. Mollie E. Pass, one of the heirs of John D. Womack, Jr., and Archie Womack; alleged that the deed of conveyance from W. W. Stell to John D. Womack, Sr., had been lost or mislaid; and that the defendant claimed the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Parks v. CaudleTexas Supreme Court · 1882
  2. March v. HuyterTexas Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Nye v. MoodyTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  4. McCutchen v. PurintonTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Dull v. BlumTexas Supreme Court · 1887

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Howell v. BowdenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  2. Kinney v. Tri-State Telephone Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1920
  3. HILL & Jahns v. LoftonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  4. Hall v. BirchfieldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
  5. Perry v. Acme Oil Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1909

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API