Legal Opinion

Garrity v. Rural Mutual Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1977No. 75-178PublishedCited by 145 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

The question is: When an insured’s loss exceeds the amount recoverable under a standard fire insurance policy written in conformity with section 203.01, Wis. Stats. 1969, 1 what are the respective rights of the insured and the subrogated insurer to the damages recovered from the tort-feasor who caused the loss?

We hold the insured is entitled to be made whole before the insurer may share in the amount recoverable from the tort-feasor. We reverse the trial court which held the insurer has a priority to the amount recoverable from a tort-feasor once the policy limits are paid to the insured.

The…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. American Surety Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Heifetz v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Lyon v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Washtenaw Mutual Fire Insurance v. BuddMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Patitucci v. GerhardtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by145 opinions

  1. Fortis Benefits v. CantuTexas Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Rimes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Diane M. Cutting and Warren L. Cutting v. Jerome Foods, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  4. Ortiz v. Great Southern Fire & Casualty Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Powell v. Blue Cross and Blue ShieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990

140 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API