American Surety Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Manufacturing Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cardozo
A contract for drilling a well at the Naval Air Station at Pensacola, Florida, was made in November, 1930, between Melton J. Gray and the United States Government. It was drawn in the standard form. Payments were to be made in accordance with approved estimates during the progress of the work, but the contracting officer was required to retain 10% of the estimated amount “ until final completion and acceptance of all work covered by the contract.” The percentage might be reduced in stated contingencies. A bond was to be given for the protection of the Government and of persons supplying labor…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Prairie State Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Henningsen v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Illinois Surety Co. v. John Davis Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Keller v. AshfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Brogan v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by90 opinions
- Martin v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Garrity v. Rural Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Prudence Realization Corp. v. GeistSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
- American Surety Co. of NY v. SampsellSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.