Legal Opinion

Heifetz v. Johnson

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1973No. 278PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.

Two issues are presented on this appeal:(1) Did the failure of the plaintiffs to join a necessary or indispensable party within the period of limitations subject the plaintiffs’ cause of action to the defense of limitation of actions ?(2) If the plaintiffs’ right of action is not barred, can the defendants raise the prior payment of $2,000 by the plaintiffs’ insurer in mitigation of their liability?

Is plaintiffs’ action barred by the statute of limitations?

An action to recover damages for injury to the person must be brought within three years. The acceptance of payment from an insurer…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bank of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Haase v. SawickiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Sellman v. HaddockNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Doerr v. WarnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  5. Patitucci v. GerhardtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. Garrity v. Rural Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Wenke Ex Rel. Laufenberg v. Gehl Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Koffman v. LeichtfussWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Landis v. Physicians Insurance Co. of Wisconsin, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Robert J. Kovalic v. Dec International, Inc., a Wisconsin Corporation, Henrik Moe, and D.E. LinsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API