Rimes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.
The question presented is whether an automobile insurer, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, which, under a subrogation agreement signed by its insured, Palmer H. Rimes, has made payment under the medical-pay provisions of its policy, has the right to recover those payments out of the monies received by its insured in a settlement with negligent third-party tortfeasors and their liability insurers, when, according to the findings and judgment of the circuit court, the settlement figure was less than the total damages sustained by the insured as the result of an automobile accident.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Garrity v. Rural Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- DeCespedes v. Prudence Mut. Cas. Co. of Chicago, Ill.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
- Lewandowski v. Continental Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. W. P. Rose Supply Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
3Cited by136 opinions
- Powell v. Blue Cross and Blue ShieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- Wos v. E. M. A. Ex Rel. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Vogt v. SchroederWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
- Liebovich v. Minnesota InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
- Shelter Mutual Insurance v. BoughSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
131 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.