Legal Opinion

Fortis Benefits v. Cantu

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 2007No. 05-0791PublishedCited by 170 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Willett

The issue in this insurance subrogation case is whether the equitable “made whole” doctrine — the rule that an insurer is not entitled to subrogation of medical benefits unless the insured has been “made whole” — trumps an insurer’s contract-based subrogation right.

After respondent Vanessa Cantu sued multiple parties for severe injuries she sustained in an auto accident, her medical insurer, petitioner Fortis Benefits, intervened, claiming a subrogation right under the policy. The various defendants settled with Cantu, and Fortis looked only to Cantu for its recovery. A divided court of…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Coker v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Reilly v. Rangers Management, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Padilla v. LaFranceTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  4. EZ Pawn Corp. v. ManciasTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Sereboff v. Mid Atlantic Medical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by170 opinions

  1. Gilbert Texas Construction, L.P. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's LondonTexas Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Pathfinder Oil & Gas, Inc. and Cathlind Energy, Llc v. Great Western Drilling, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Fairfield Insurance Co. v. Stephens Martin Paving, LPTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Bowden v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
  5. In Re BP Products North America, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2008

165 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API