Fortis Benefits v. Cantu
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Willett
The issue in this insurance subrogation case is whether the equitable “made whole” doctrine — the rule that an insurer is not entitled to subrogation of medical benefits unless the insured has been “made whole” — trumps an insurer’s contract-based subrogation right.
After respondent Vanessa Cantu sued multiple parties for severe injuries she sustained in an auto accident, her medical insurer, petitioner Fortis Benefits, intervened, claiming a subrogation right under the policy. The various defendants settled with Cantu, and Fortis looked only to Cantu for its recovery. A divided court of…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Coker v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- Reilly v. Rangers Management, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1987
- Padilla v. LaFranceTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- EZ Pawn Corp. v. ManciasTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Sereboff v. Mid Atlantic Medical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by170 opinions
- Gilbert Texas Construction, L.P. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's LondonTexas Supreme Court · 2010
- Pathfinder Oil & Gas, Inc. and Cathlind Energy, Llc v. Great Western Drilling, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 2019
- Fairfield Insurance Co. v. Stephens Martin Paving, LPTexas Supreme Court · 2008
- Bowden v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
- In Re BP Products North America, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
165 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.