Legal Opinion

Ortiz v. Great Southern Fire & Casualty Insurance Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1980No. B-8981PublishedCited by 103 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPEARS, Justice.

The question presented is whether an insurer is entitled to complete reimbursement out of a third-party tortfeasor’s settlement payment which only partially compensates the insureds’ loss. The trial court rendered summary judgment allowing the insurer subrogation in an amount equal to its payment to the insureds, and the court of civil appeals affirmed. 587 S.W.2d 818. We reverse and remand.

Mike and Olivia Ortiz obtained a fire insurance policy on their home from Great Southern Fire and Casualty Insurance Company. The Ortizes did not insure the contents of the house. On…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Garrity v. Rural Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. General Exchange Insurance v. DriscollMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  3. Washtenaw Mutual Fire Insurance v. BuddMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  4. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. W. P. Rose Supply Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. ElkinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by103 opinions

  1. Fortis Benefits v. CantuTexas Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Mid-Continent Insurance Co. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Medina v. HerreraTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Powell v. Blue Cross and Blue ShieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  5. Lundstrom v. United Services Automobile Ass'n-CIC, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API