Legal Opinion

Bearpaw v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1990No. 89-214PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

URBIGKIT, Chief Justice.

This appeal from a second degree murder conviction presents basic questions of an inadequate record, ineffectiveness of trial counsel, and fundamental concerns about the fairness of the trial. We reverse and remand for retrial.

I.ISSUES

Appellant initially contends:

ISSUE 1

Whether the trial court erred in instructing the jury that they could infer malice from the use of a deadly weapon and that one of the elements of manslaughter was killing without malice, expressed or implied.

ISSUE 2

Whether the trial court’s instructions concerning second degree murder and manslaughter…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  3. Frias v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  4. United States v. Henry SelvaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  5. United States v. George W. Brumley, Sr., Robert W. Harrison, and William T. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. English v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Calene v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Schmidt v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Candelaria v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Farbotnik v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API