Legal Opinion

Candelaria v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1995No. 94-49PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACY, Justice.

Appellant Ruben Candelaria appeals from his conviction for two counts of homicide by vehicle.

We affirm.

Issues

Appellant presents five issues:

Issue I.

Did the trial court err when it failed to suppress the results of the second drug test performed on the Appellant?

Issue II.

Did the trial court err when it denied Appellant’s theory of the defense instructions thus depriving Appellant of his constitutional right to due process?

Issue III.

Whether the Appellant’s convictions must be reversed in accordance with this Court’s decision in Bearpaw v. State, 803 P.2d 70 (Wyo.1990).

Issue IV.

Did…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Martinez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Farbotnik v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Lauthern v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Roderick v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Price v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Hodges v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Allen v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Madrid v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Bitz v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Vit v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1996

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API