Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided August 13, 2001No. 00-160PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Justice.

[11] Appellant, William Wade Schmidt (Schmidt), brings this ten-issue challenge to his conviction for immoral and indecent acts 1 with a child under the age of 18 years. In this instance, the female victim was 11 years old.

[12] We affirm.

ISSUES

[13] Schmidt poses these issues for resolution by this Court:

I. Does the lack of an adequate record for appellate review require reversal[?]

II. Whether the admission of the numerous prior consistent statements of the complainant requires reversal[.]

III,. Did the trial court correctly instruct the jury as to the essential elements of the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Chapman v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Ochoa v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Lane v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Metzger v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Pierson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Giles v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Mueller v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Butz v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Seymore v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Lopez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API