Calene v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
URBIGKIT, Justice.
This appeal tests the procedures utilized under Wyoming law when ineffectiveness of trial counsel is alleged by the convicted defendant.
This opinion will address the procedures available for appellant to factually develop any contention claiming ineffectiveness of his legal representation which was not documented within the original trial record. We reverse the decision of the trial court which denied a hearing on the motion for a new trial. This case is remanded for the trial court to hold a factual hearing on the validity of the allegations made by John Calene of…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited128 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
123 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Woods v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
- Gleason v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
- Byron Nelson Griggs v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
- Olsen v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- Guy v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.