Legal Opinion

English v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1999No. 98-90PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAYLOR, Justice, Retired.

Convicted of one count of taking indecent ■ liberties with a minor, appellant now claims that numerous evidentiary errors were made by the district court, and that the prosecutor’s closing argument was both improper and prejudicial. Finding that substantial errors occurred, we reverse and remand for a new trial.

I.ISSUES

Appellant, Kevin English (English), presents four issues for review:

I. Did the trial court commit reversible error when it permitted the complaining witness’s mother and the investigating officer to testify about hearsay statements made to them by the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Hopkinson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. State v. MichaelsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
  5. State v. ScherzerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Dysthe v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Commonwealth v. DelbridgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Byron Nelson Griggs v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Burton v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Duke v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API