Legal Opinion

Farbotnik v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1993No. 90-277PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The primary issue to be resolved in this ease is whether the rule articulated in Bearpaw v. State, 803 P.2d 70 (Wyo.1990), should be applied retrospectively to a case in which the defendant was a fugitive for almost seven years after his conviction. Application of the Bearpaw rule to this case would require reversal. If the Bear-paw rule is not applied, collateral issues relating to the sufficiency of the evidence and unlawful aspects of the sentence must be addressed. In addition, James Alan Farbotnik (Farbotnik) raises, through a pro se brief, issues of ineffective…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. State v. GreenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1997
  2. Mehring v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Springfield v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Collins v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Hodges v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1995

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API