Legal Opinion

City of Blackwell v. Murduck

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 23, 1952No. 34908PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Neal, J.

This is the third time the controversy between Wilbur Mur-duck and the city of Blackwell, Oklahoma, upon the issue of damage to Murduck’s land, is presented to' this court. Murduck et al. v. City of Blackwell, 198 Okla. 171, 176 P. 2d 1002, in which case we held the trial court erred in sustaining a demurrer to plaintiff’s evidence and dismissing plaintiff’s action. In the City of Blackwell v. Murduck et al., 202 Okla. 216, 212 P. 2d 135, we sustained the trial court’s action granting Murduck a new trial after a verdict was returned in favor of the defendant city.

The present action is based…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Oklahoma City v. WellsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  2. Cruse v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  3. Murduck v. City of BlackwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  4. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. JenningsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. Stewart v. Marland Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Oklahoma Turnpike Authority v. DyeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  2. Paul Hellman, Inc. v. ReedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  3. Morain v. City of NormanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  4. Jones v. FarmerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  5. Chandler v. Oklahoma Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API