Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Marland Pipe Line Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 11, 1931No. 29,676; No. 29,677PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

These cases were tried separately in the court below, but have been consolidated here. The pipe-line company brought condemnation proceedings to secure a right of way for its pipe line across the lands owned by appellees. The appellees appealed to the district court from the award of condemnation allowed by appraisers. Judgment was for the landowners in an amount greater than the appraisers allowed. The pipe-line company appealed.

The facts are these: The pipe-line company had under way the construction of a pipe line for the purpose of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cunningham v. Memphis Railroad Terminal Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Lanning v. GaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  3. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Ry. v. SansomTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  5. Union Ry. Co. v. Standard Wheel Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Glover v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  2. State v. HelmArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Epperson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  4. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  5. City of Blackwell v. MurduckSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API