Murduck v. City of Blackwell
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
This is'an action for damages commenced by plaintiffs in error against the City of Blackwell.
Plaintiffs are the owners of the northwest quarter, sec. 28, twp. 29 north, range 2 west in Kay county. Approximately the north half of the farm is bluff and high prairie land. The south half comprises a basin. Along the south side of the farm, partly on plaintiffs’ land and partly on the farm south of it, there is a ridge some six or eight feet high. The ridge extends from the high bluff to the west on plaintiffs’ land eastward to a high .bluff, forming the basin. It is enclosed by the high bluff on…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Curtis v. La Grande Hydraulic Water Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1890
- Pahlka v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893
- Gyra v. WindlerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907
- Lindsay v. Winona & St. Peter RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Sides v. John Cordes, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- City of Tucson v. Apache MotorsArizona Supreme Court · 1952
- Flour Mills of America, Inc. v. American Steel Building Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
- Ulan v. Vend-A-Coin, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
- Peppers Refining Company v. SpiveySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.