Legal Opinion

Paul Hellman, Inc. v. Reed

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 7, 1961No. 38835PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff’s action is for damages allegedly sustained by reason of the defendant’s breach of warranty in selling him a Buick automobile on which there was a balance due under a conditional sales contract and which lien was not paid. Service of summons was not had on Charles M. Serviss, a defendant in the trial court, and he did not enter an appearance. From verdict of a jury in favor of plaintiff and upon which judgment was entered, the defendant Paul Heilman, Inc., has perfected its appeal. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.

Pleadings

It is alleged that on May…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Consolidated Cut Stone Co. v. SeidenbachSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  2. Sackett v. RoseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Staner v. McGrathSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. City of Blackwell v. MurduckSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  5. Boston v. CauseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. N.H. v. Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.)Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  2. A-Plus Janitorial & Carpet Cleaning v. the Employers' Workers' Compensation Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  3. Chief Freight Lines Co. v. Strick Finance Co. (In Re Chief Freight Lines Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1984
  4. Bankers Investment Company v. HumphreySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  5. Bell v. TollefsenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API