Legal Opinion

Jones v. Farmer

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 30, 1962No. 39284PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERRY, Justice.

In this action, defendant in error, hereafter referred to as “plaintiff”, seeks to recover damages from plaintiffs in error, hereafter referred to as “defendants”, for bodily injuries and damages to her automobile sustained as a result of the accident hereafter referred to.

The jury to whom the case was tried, returned a verdict in plaintiff’s favor in the amount of $20,000.00. From order of the trial court, denying defendants’ motion for new trial, which was directed to judgment on the verdict, defendants perfected this appeal.

Plaintiff’s theory and contention is that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Battles v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Commission for Crippled ChildrenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  2. Ritter v. Perma-Stone CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  3. Oklahoma Power & Water Co. v. HowellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  4. Stout v. RutherfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  5. Louis Berkman Co. v. Unger Metals Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dirickson v. MingsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  2. Birmingham Steel & Supply, Inc. v. Smithco Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  3. Robinson v. State Stove & Mfg. Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1973
  4. Birmingham Steel & Supply, Inc. v. Smithco Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  5. Jones v. FarmerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API