Legal Opinion

Chandler v. Oklahoma Turnpike Authority

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 18, 1954No. 36078PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CORN, Justice.

Plaintiffs brought this action seeking to establish, by way of reverse condemnation, their right to recover damages and compensation, which they alleged resulted from defendant’s acts in construction of the Turner Turnpike, performed by virtue of the powers vested in the Oklahoma Turnpike Authority.

Plaintiffs own a 160-acre homestead located near the Turnpike. Prior to construction of the Turnpike a county road, which served as a mail and school bus route, extended from the town of Wellston (a mile west of plaintiffs’ land) along the south side of plaintiffs’ farm and south ½…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Oklahoma City v. WellsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  2. Cruse v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  3. Stedman v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Hawks v. WalshSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. Oklahoma City v. Collins-Dietz-Morris Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Oklahoma Turnpike Authority v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  2. Garvin Soil Conservation District v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API