Legal Opinion

People v. Villalobos

California Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 2012No. S176574PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LIU, J.

We granted review to address whether imposition of a mandatory restitution fine violates a defendant’s plea agreement where the parties fail to make the fine an express term of the agreement and where the trial court fails to mention the fine during the plea colloquy. We explained in People v. Crandell (2007) 40 Cal.4th 1301 [57 Cal.Rptr.3d 349, 156 P.3d 364] {Crandell), that “ ‘the core question in every case is . . . whether the restitution fine was actually negotiated and made a part of the plea agreement, or whether it was left to the discretion of the court.’ ” {Id. at p.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. People v. McClellanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. In Re MoserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. People v. SoriaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  5. People v. DickersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Doe v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  2. People v. EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  3. People v. MorrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. People v. DillardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  5. Michael Cuero v. Matthew CateCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API