Legal Opinion

People v. Dillard

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 14, 2017No. H042086PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GROVER, J.

—The trial court denied defendant’s motion to withdraw a no contest plea to human trafficking of a minor, finding that the probation conditions set forth in Penal Code section 1203.067 were not direct consequences of defendant’s plea and thus had not required a preplea advisement under Bunnell v. Superior Court (1975) 13 Cal.3d 592 [119 Cal.Rptr. 302, 531 P.2d 1086] (Bunnell). The court denied the motion for the additional reason that defendant failed to establish prejudice. Defendant challenges that ruling, and raises ineffective assistance of counsel as a separate basis for…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. People v. HarveyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. People v. WhartonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. People v. BoyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Harris v. Superior Court of San Joaquin Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  2. Harris v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2017
  3. People v. Jenkins CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2021
  4. People v. Lara CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2021
  5. People v. Le CA6California Court of Appeal · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API