Legal Opinion

People v. Morris

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 12, 2015No. H041781PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BAMATTRE-MANOUKIAN, J.

I. INTRODUCTION

Defendant Ronald Dean Morris pleaded no contest to the felony charge of petty theft with three or more prior theft convictions (Pen. Code, § 666, subd. (a)), 1 and admitted the allegations that he had one prior violent or serious felony conviction (§ 667, subds. (b)-(i)) that also qualified as a strike within the meaning of the “Three Strikes” law (§§ 667, subds. (b)-(i), 1170.12) and he had served two prior prison terms (§ 667.5, subd. (b)). The trial court imposed a term of four years in the state prison. Defendant appealed and this court affirmed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Santisas v. GoodinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. People v. SouzaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  4. People v. VillalobosCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  5. People v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. BunyardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  2. People v. CarranzaAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 2016
  3. People v. ButcherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. People v. CarranzaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. People v. Jones CA2/6California Court of Appeal · 2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API