Legal Opinion

People v. Walker

California Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1991No. S017854PublishedCited by 178 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ARABIAN, J.

We granted review in this case to resolve a conflict in the Court of Appeal over the proper means of remedying the erroneous imposition of a restitution fine. As explained below, we order the restitution fine of this case reduced to the statutory minimum of $100.

I. Facts

Defendant was charged by information with two felony counts, including, in count 2, the attempted use of a destructive device with the intent to injure or intimidate. (Pen. Code, § 12303.3.) According to the probation report, defendant placed in his ex-wife’s car a bomb which was designed to detonate when the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. In Re TahlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. In Re YurkoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Bunnell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by178 opinions

  1. People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. People v. AvilaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  3. People v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. People v. GuruleCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  5. People v. McKinnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011

173 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API